![]() Some voters in northern Wisconsin village got absentee ballots that were already filled in clerk blames 'human error' - Mitchell Schmidt, Wisconsin State Journal, February 12, 2023 Pennacchio Proposes Reforms to Address Voting Machine Problems in Recent Elections (New Jersey) - Insider NJ, February 12, 2023 Mike Lindell backs rightwing California county as it ditches voting machines - The Guardian (UK), March 4, 2023Ĭochise County gives election skeptic recorder near full control of elections (Arizona) - VoteBeat, February 28, 2023 How Trump’s big lie played out on the CPAC stage - The Guardian (UK), March 6, 2023 Town residents lose patience with 'stolen election' deluded board (Shasta County, CA) - MSNBC's Alex Wagner Tonight, March 17, 2023Ī red California county has no way to conduct elections after dropping voting system (Shasta County CA) - NPR, March 9, 2023ģ more Republican states announce they're leaving a key voting data partnership - NPR, March 6, 2023 Proposal to ban ballot drop boxes meets flood of opposition (Maine) - Lakes Region Weekly, March 22, 2023ĭon’t look now, but Democrats and Republicans are crafting election law together (Arizona) - Votebeat, March 20, 2023 Lincoln County election officials, clerk and recorder resign posts (MT) - The Western News, March 28, 2023 “Past their capacity”: Independent review reveals why Maricopa County ballot printers failed on Election Day (AZ) - VoteBeat, April 10, 2023ĭid Fox News Melt This County's Brain? (Shasta County CA) - Vice News documentary, March 31, 2023 *Tip: You can use the search function in your browser to find articles on a specific topic.įox News settles blockbuster defamation lawsuit with Dominion Voting Systems - NPR, April 18, 2023Įlection officials have ideas for stopping a 2024 crisis before it even starts - Politico, April 11, 2023 If you disagree, elections in Dana Point occur every two years, and the current council majority can be removed in a way that will not hamstring the Town Center project with rigid design constraints.Below is a list of stories compiled by the California Voter Foundation from news sources around the country reporting on threats to election officials, election security, and issues resulting from increased harassment and threats in election administration. ![]() We think the council has done well to uphold those values, and a “Yes” vote for Measure I will confirm that. And it is the responsibility of the elected Dana Point City Council, not the voters, to weigh the city’s tremendous need for amenities and maintaining the spirit of the community. We think it is important, and necessary, for development in the Dana Point Town Center to continue to have flexibility. No two developments are alike, and what makes sense for one may not work for the other. That is why we recommend a “No” vote on Measure H and “Yes” vote on Measure I. While the above doesn’t offer much guidance, what is important to remember is that Measure H imposes rigid design constraints uniformly across the Town Center development area in what we feel is akin to ballot-box zoning since changes would be subject to a vote of the people. ![]() On the other hand is Measure I, which “ratifies the Town Center Plan previously approved by the City Council and the California Coastal Commission, as well as the amendments thereto approved by the City Council in 2015.” On one hand, according to ballot literature, Measure H would change “the Town Center Plan previously approved by the City Council and the California Coastal Commission, as well as the amendments thereto approved by the City Council in 2015.” Voters in Dana Point are faced with competing measures on the future of the city’s Town Center.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |